Aarva

Crosscut · 24 min

Bridging Partisan Divides

Whether fighting off a massive AI data center or sitting down with trained student facilitators, divided communities are finding practical ways to bypass national politics and solve local problems.

In a Divided America, the Left and Right Unite to Oppose Artificial Intelligence Data Centers × How Students at Colorado State Helped Teach Their Community to Stop Talking Past Each Other and Manage Complex Problems

Published 2026-09-02

0:00 / 23:42 · Narrator Sulafat/Charon/Vindemiatrix

In this episode

The Conversation

How Students at Colorado State Helped Teach Their Community to Stop Talking Past Each Other and Manage Complex Problems

by Martin Carcasson, Director, Center for Public Deliberation, Colorado State University

Read on The Conversation →

The connection

When a massive corporate project rolls into town, national political labels often vanish. Two recent articles show how communities bypass the usual partisan shouting matches, though they do it in completely different ways. In *The Independent*, Will Weissert and Susan Montoya Bryan capture how the sudden arrival of giant AI data centers is forcing conservatives and environmentalists into an unexpected, organic alliance. An essay by Martin Carcasson in *The Conversation* looks at what happens when cooperation has to be carefully engineered instead. He follows trained college students who guide thorny local debates, keeping neighbors from springing familiar political traps. Putting these together reveals a striking picture of how people actually solve problems when the national cameras look away.

Will Weissert and Susan Montoya Bryan leave you in a firehouse in Murdock, Nebraska, watching conservative farmers and environmentalists find common ground against a massive AI data center. It happens organically. A shared threat to land and water simply overrides the usual political labels. Read alongside Martin Carcasson, up next, that kind of spontaneous unity starts to look like a lucky exception. Carcasson looks at local problem-solving from a completely different starting point. He points out that human brains are basically hardwired to fail at exactly the kind of cooperation happening in Nebraska. Instead of waiting for a shared enemy to force people together, Carcasson focuses on engineering the conversation itself. Notice what happens when those two-minute microphone rants are replaced with structured, student-led discussions. Suddenly, communities can untangle messy issues like marijuana zoning without falling back on identity politics. Read together, a sharp contrast surfaces: Weissert and Bryan show people uniting against a clear corporate threat, while Carcasson asks how to get people talking when the obstacle is just human nature.

A bulldozer breaking ground for a massive server farm and a student setting up folding chairs in a high school gym both force a town to drop national political labels. What lingers is how quickly those bitter divisions fade when local reality takes over. Whether driven by a shared threat to the water supply or a strictly timed town hall, the result is neighbors actually talking to neighbors. The question left behind is this: Does finding common ground always require an outside threat or a trained mediator, or can a town learn to do this on its own?